Famous for defying
genre and narrative conventions, British director Ben Wheatley is quickly
becoming a cinematic phenomenon exciting audiences with his gritty and highly
realistic approach to filmmaking. Following from the success of last year’s
dark rom/com ‘Sightseers’, Wheatley has taken on a far more ambitious project
in ‘A field in England’, surrounding the story of a group of deserters in the
civil war as they are captured by an estranged alchemist searching for
treasure. Being released on
multi-platforms on the same day (5th July), ‘a field in England’ is
an extremely audacious project, supplying a narrative which is highly extravagant
and certainly not for everyone.

Whilst this style and
cinematic grace coagulates perfectly with the terrific acting performances, the
narrative ultimately proves to be too thin with the film filling it’s time with
egotistical moments of nonsensical images and overlong scenes of a ‘bad trip’. The overall pretentious nature of this film
frustratingly looms over its 90 minute running time allowing the film few
moments to legitimately express some genuine scenes of character chemistry or
simple normal occurrences.
To create such a film
is no doubt congratulatory as certainly very few Directors could replicate the bizarre
and highly psychedelic piece that Wheatley has created. ‘A field in England’ benefits greatly from its
intelligent release schedule allowing great choice to audiences for a film
which will no doubt be highly opinionated. With a tight script that morphs today’s
dialect with the pasts seamlessly through fantastic acting performances across
the board, it was a shame to see the plot enter into a nosedive being filmed terrifically
yet showing scenes of no real value and very little payoff.
7/10- A highly psychological and convoluted ride with few
twists and turns but plenty of mushrooms.
Calum Russell
No comments:
Post a Comment